similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to typefox.com

Typefox alternatives & similar sites

Sven Fuchs: Design as Systematic Practice – Type Director, Design Systems Lead, Researcher, Educator — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sethlooper.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Seth Looper — Designer, Educator, Researcher	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ekaterinamalakhova.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ekaterina Malakhova — Brand Identity Designer & Art Director \| Design Systems	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gsestudio.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Guy-Serge Emmanuel - Designer, Educator, Researcher	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikelrosenthal.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	PBK Studio — Mikel Rosenthal \| Art Direction · Design Systems · Product Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mikefortuna.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mike Fortuna - Engineering Leader, Design Systems \| New York City	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikebowser.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mike Bowser \| UX & Design Systems	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dasys.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design Automation Systems \| Home	United Kingdom en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikesteven-francois.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mike Steven François \| Art & Design Director – Editorial & Brand Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sharanda.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Michael Sharanda — Creative Director, Design Engineer & Brand Experience Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chassis-ui.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Chassis UI · Design Systems that Scale & Sync	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chassisui.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Chassis UI · Design Systems that Scale & Sync	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eiznerdesign.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Eizner Design – Graphic Design Studio	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikedoesdesign.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mike Newcomb - UX Designer, Researcher, and Strategist	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sevenwhys.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design System Studio for Enterprise \| Seven Whys - Design Studio	Cyprus~ en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sevenwhy.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design System Studio for Enterprise \| Seven Whys - Design Studio	Cyprus~ en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsesliuk.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Oleksii Tsesliuk · UI/UX Director, Redesign & Data Science	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
serrasemi.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Serra Semi \| Creative Director, Designer	en	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cumulusassociation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cumulus \| Global Association of Art and Design Education and Research	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.