similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to turinghall.com

Turinghall alternatives & similar sites

Turing Hall - Engineering Fellowship for Teenagers in Egypt — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
shahidyousuf.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Shahid Yousuf \| Software Engineering Blog	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curiouslyrecurringthoughts.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Curiously Recurring Thoughts – Thoughts on Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xeb.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Shortjump! \| Reversing engineering, programming and what not…	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cylindr.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jelle Maas — Full-stack Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
allanjuliani.com.br ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Allan Juliani - Software Engineer	Brazil en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eddiedonalds.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Eddie Donalds — Software engineer in the making	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ekhabarov.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Software Engineering by Eugene Khabarov	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
gukov.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	gukov.dev \| Software egineering and math.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karthikjain.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Karthik Jain H.J \| C++ Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mihaivintila.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mihai Vintila \| Computer Engineering Portfolio	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katyaserechenko.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Katya Serechenko \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gustavoferrufino.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gustavo Ferrufino \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keithchoa.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Keith Choa - BASc. Computer Engineering @ UWaterloo	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sfarin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Python for Petroleum Engineers	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccleery.io ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Libre Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibrahimipek.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ibrahim Ipek – Computer Engineering Student & Developer Portfolio	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-adel.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ahmed Adel \| Embedded Software Engineer. C/C++. RTOS. Bare-metal Programming. Parallel Programming. UML	en	programming-languages Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turingtaco.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Turing Taco Tales	en	programming-languages Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.