similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to tryjam.dev

Tryjam alternatives & similar sites

Jam | Build a bug-free product. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
abhishek.build ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abhishek Dutta — Product Builder & Freelance Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bafiklabs.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Bafik Labs — Products built with intention	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
david-platform.eu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Data Product Factory - DIGAZU	European Union en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abarth.design ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ash Barth \| Product Designer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1000digitalproducts.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1000 Digital Products	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlocationtechnical.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	On location technical Tech Products	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sammaanarora.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sammaan Arora \| Senior Product Backend Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelbeek.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Beek - VP Product @ VEED.io	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1trustreview.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1TrustReview — One honest take per product. No filler.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
luxeave.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Luxeave — Production-Grade Backend Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisdomain.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jon C. Phillips – Building Products / Growing Audiences / Crafting Experiences	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevirofficial.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vir \| Builder / Storyteller	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewiseminds.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Complete product teams that help scale ups speed up delivery	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandboxbuilds.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sandbox Builds	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theworkprod.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Product, Design & Engineering Partner \| BlueInGreen	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samstubbs.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sam Stubbs \| Building systems and thinking in public	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelfaith.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kyaw Tay Zar (Samuel TZ) — Indie Maker & Product Manager	en	technology-and-computing Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomrugo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Philip Rugo \| Product + Creative Technology	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.