similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to traina.ai

Traina alternatives & similar sites

TRAINA／トレイナ｜「コトバ」に強い日本発AIソリューションTRAINA／トレイナ｜NRI — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sunrise-inc.co.jp ↗	30 match shared topic	サンライズ｜SUNRISE	Japan ja	animation-and-anime	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nri.com ↗	30 match shared topic	Nomura Research Institute (NRI)	ja	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sunrisemedical.jp ↗	30 match shared topic	サンライズメディカルジャパン株式会社 \| Sunrise Medical	Japan ja	special-needs-kids Kentico	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanrio-danshi.jp ↗	30 match shared topic	Sanrio-Danshi.jp – Casino Guides	Japan ja	casinos-and-gambling WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clinicnabvi.com ↗	28 match shared topic	臨床現場AI活用法	ja	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maisonmoschino.com ↗	28 match shared topic	純利益爆上げAI活用法	ja	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mosh.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	MOSH:クリエイター向けサービス販売プラットフォーム	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stinger3.com ↗	28 match shared topic	stinger3 - Claude Codeで仕事を変える	ja	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lifehacker.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	ライフハッカー・ジャパン	Japan ja	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-method.com ↗	28 match shared topic	クリスタルメソッド株式会社｜バーチャルヒューマンが業務をサポート！	Japan~ ja	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
graffer.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	Graffer, Inc. 株式会社グラファー \| Graffer, Inc. 株式会社グラファー	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
japan.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	海の日特別号 — 2026年7月20日 \| Japan.co.jp	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
plag.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	Plag-剽窃チェッカーとAI検出器	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barclays.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	Barclays Japan \| ホーム	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anlp.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	言語処理学会	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helpfeel.com ↗	28 match shared topic	Helpfeel（ヘルプフィール）｜AIチャット×RAGでVoc分析も疑問解決	ja	artificial-intelligence HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
i-pro.com ↗	28 match shared topic	TOP \| i-PRO	ja	artificial-intelligence Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atr.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	ATR	Japan ja	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.