similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to tipa-tipa.com

Tipa Tipa alternatives & similar sites

Tipa-Tipa - Villes et Architectures en Ateliers — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aain.be ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Atelier Architecture IN	Belgium fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ajarchitecture.be ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Atelier Janssen Architecture	Belgium fr	design Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbfa.be ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	bbfa - architecture	Belgium fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mambo.archi ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Architectes \| Mambo architectures \| Marseille	fr	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nahbstudio.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	NAHBstudio architecture	fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agraf.archi ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	A-Graf, atelier d'architecture à Nyons et Paris	fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aag.archi ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	AAG – Atelier d'Architecture Galand	fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aad.mr ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	AAD – Atelier d'Architecture et de Design	fr	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garchitecture.be ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	G. architecture	Belgium fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
atelier4d.be ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Projets \| Atelier 4D - Architectes	Belgium fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afbar.be ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	AFBAR - Atelier Ferier Bunis Architecture à Bruxelles	Belgium fr	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atelierarchipel.be ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Atelier d’architecture Archipel \| Tournai	Belgium fr	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abita.archi ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	abita — atelier d'architecture résidentielle à Québec	fr	design WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ad-architecture.be ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alizée Dassonville \| architecture	Belgium fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arsymbiose.be ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Arsymbiose Architecture	Belgium fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abaquearchitecture.be ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	abaque architecture	Belgium fr	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axiome-architecture.be ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Axiome Architecture	Belgium fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atelier-moneo.be ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	l'atelier moneō \| architecture & patrimoine	Belgium fr	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.