similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to tinandjar.com

Tinandjar alternatives & similar sites

TinAndJar – ❤️ Creating Things ❤️ — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
1nine.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	All things digital - 1nine.com	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bloggingtycoon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Blogging Tycoon - Inspiring Creativity Through Writing	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kyleio.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kyle Johnston's creative journal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffreyfossett.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jeff Fossett	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gun8.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	gun8 - a journal of the way things are	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonr.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jason Rodrigues	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeremyhutchings.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jeremy Hutchings	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creationengine.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Creation Engine	en	technology-and-computing Shopify	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dracklings.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dracklings Consulting - Home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rnitvision.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	RN iT ViSiON \| Creative IT Solutions	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
themisfire.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	misfire — a blog about not finishing things	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
blert.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	blert.org \| interesting things \| it all started with a cat	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robahall.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Rob Hall – Discovering the full data landscape.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elwyn.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ben elwyn \| creative technologist	Colombia en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
88999925.xyz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Personal Blog: Tech Insights and Creative Writing Adventures	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guillermo-roman.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Guillermo Roman \| Rethinking the internet identity crisis	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ttested.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	T-Tested \| Blogging about all things data	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thegoodishtechie.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Goodish Techie – All Things No-Code and WordPress	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.