similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to tiffteof.com

Tiffteof alternatives & similar sites

tiffany teofilo – writer, marketer, storyteller — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
marseanelson.com ↗	70 match 3 shared topics	Marsea Nelson \| writer, editor, marketer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaywhistler.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Jay Whistler – writer \| educator \| editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookechoes.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Book Echoes – Write your way to success	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewritersreverie.com ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	The Writer's Reverie - Notes on the craft of making stories.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
janetschwind.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	janet schwind – I write. I edit. I'm ridiculously professional.	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thoroughedits.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Thorough Edits \| thoroughly editing your written words	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owlfocusediting.com ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Owl Focus Editing	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeremyblachman.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Jeremy Blachman	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johndavidkudrick.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	John David Kudrick – putting words to work for you	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paceediting.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	pace_editing	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
jessicalynnehenkle.com ↗	50 match 2 shared topics	Jessica Lynne Henkle – writer / editor / storyteller	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marisacharpentier.com ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Marisa Charpentier – Writer, editor, fact-checker	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackdowdswritingblog.com ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Jack Dowd – Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackdowdwriter.com ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Jack Dowd – Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeremyjohnparker.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	JEREMY JOHN PARKER – Writer, Editor, Designer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewriterproject.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	The Writer Project – What Story Do You Have to Tell?	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paigewyattwrites.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Paige Wyatt – Writer and Editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thestory.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Mi Manifesto \| The Sanctuary for Storytellers	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.