similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to tiatec.com

Tiatec alternatives & similar sites

olivedrab-hyena-111478.hostingersite.com — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
meinleos.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	LEOS - Leistungserbringer Online-Suite - Übersicht	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rell-it.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Homepage Ralph Ellinger	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2lforge.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - 2lforge.com	de	software-and-applications Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-klr.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	in-software.com - IN-Software	de	software-and-applications Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-software.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	in-software.com - IN-Software	de	software-and-applications Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-software.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	in-software.com - IN-Software	de	software-and-applications Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
in-software.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	in-software.com - IN-Software	de	software-and-applications Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
access-entwickler.koeln ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Oliver Dithmer Softwareentwicklung	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reichenbachs.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Übersicht \|R² Software & Systeme	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ressco.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Renger Software \| Services & Consulting	Germany de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
efinger-online.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Das Softwarestudio Christian Efinger	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
filelinker-project.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	filelinkerenterprise.com - FileLinker	de	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
filelinker-service.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	filelinkerenterprise.com - FileLinker	de	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
filelinkerenterprise.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	filelinkerenterprise.com - FileLinker	de	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
printf-debugging.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Oliver Schneidewind / Technischer Informatiker	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
printfdebugging.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Oliver Schneidewind / Technischer Informatiker	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
railkit.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	RailKit.de – Eine andere WordPress-Site.	Germany de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
springer.software ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Springer Software – Intelligente Lösungen für Automatisierung und Softwareentwicklung	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.