similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to threadfool.com

Threadfool alternatives & similar sites

Robin Paul · Notes on Software Design & Data Architecture | Robin Paul — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
skharchikov.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	skharchikov - Software Engineer \| Rust \| Scala	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
java-design-patterns.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Explore, Learn, and Master Industry-Standard Patterns \| Java Design Patterns	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drewxs.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Andrew X. Shah \| Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomasariyanto.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Thomas Ariyanto - Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
simten.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Simten — Hardware design in TypeScript	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dhruvsaxena.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dhruv Saxena - Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakeroid.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ivan Karabadzhak - Software Engineer	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eecs404.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	EECS 404: Game Engine Architecture (Create an Engine - University of Michigan)	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eecs498.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	EECS 404: Game Engine Architecture (Create an Engine - University of Michigan)	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wavilon.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Gonzalez, Senior Python Developer & Software Architect - developer@danielgonzalez.me	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jack-phillips.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jack Phillips \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curiouslyrecurringthoughts.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Curiously Recurring Thoughts – Thoughts on Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gaelencollins.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Gaelen Collins - Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
j0ey.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Joey - Software Developer and Reverse Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ahmadmageed.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Ahmad Mageed - Software Ninjaneer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thingsaaronmade.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Things Aaron Made - Aaron Gough, Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakobhansen.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Hansen - Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theswiftdev.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Articles about application development - The.Swift.Dev.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.