similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to thinkkeen.org

Thinkkeen alternatives & similar sites

Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
think-keen.com ↗	82 match 1 shared topics	Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkkeen.com ↗	82 match 1 shared topics	Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
criticalthinking.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Foundation for Critical Thinking	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4ca.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Computer Science for California	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4ky.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Computer Science for Kentucky	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sangmoolee.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sang Moo Lee - Mathematics Education Researcher \| Critical Thinking in Math \| OISE, University of Toronto	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casp-uk.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrahamtoai.online ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	From Abraham to AI: Classical Mathematics & Science Curriculum	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medienbildung.team ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Working Group on Educational Theory and Practices of Critical Computational Literacy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clscholarship.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Critical Language Scholarship Program	United States~ en	education Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambprize.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Lamb Prize in Political Science \| Rewarding undergraduate innovation and good writing.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badreuniversity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Deen + Modern Science Education	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lyfelabz.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	LyfeLabz \| Science Learning Hub	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4-me.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CS4Maine – Support Computer Science for ALL Maine Students	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlinesciencestudy.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Online Science Study	en	education Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlinespss.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Statistical Data Analysis Help-SPSS Thesis Help\| OnlineSPSS.com	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cfsre.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education	en	education Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4tx.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CS4TX – Spreading Computer Science Education in Texas	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.