similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to thinkkeen.com

Thinkkeen alternatives & similar sites

Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
thinkkeen.org ↗	82 match 1 shared topics	Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkingthomas.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Thinking Thomas - Critical Thinking for Intelligent People	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctlessons.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Computational Thinking Lessons	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
criticalthinking.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Foundation for Critical Thinking	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkingengine.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ThinkingEngine — AI Socratic Dialogue for K–12 Critical Thinking	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aavishkaar-palampur.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aavishkaar – Curiosity, Creativity, & Critical Thinking Through Math And Science	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timeseriestime.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Time Series for Data Scientists - Statistical Time Series	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thethinkingcritic.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Thinking Critic	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkinghabitats.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	THINKING PRO Curriculum Unit \| Build Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing Skills	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniellesmclaughlin.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Danielle S. McLaughlin – Children's Author and Educator: Critical Thinking for Social Justice Specialist	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bfranquidiversity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Critical Thinking in Diverse Cultures – "Educating the Youngest"	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tinkerfarmscolorado.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Rhetor's ToolboxResources for connection, collaboration, critical thinking, and cultivating learning in the ELA classroom	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
epicdaypress.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Small facts for thinking big	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timeseriesreasoning.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Table of Contents - Statistical Modeling and Forecasting	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4ca.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Computer Science for California	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs4ky.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Computer Science for Kentucky	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ipolisci.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	iPoliSci - Political Science Education Hub	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3sdabovethemean.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3 SD Above the Mean – Why settle for average statistical consulting?	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.