similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to thinkingengine.org

Thinkingengine alternatives & similar sites

ThinkingEngine — AI Socratic Dialogue for K–12 Critical Thinking — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
think-keen.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkkeen.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Think·Keen - Critical Thinking lessons for Science & Statistics	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sangmoolee.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sang Moo Lee - Mathematics Education Researcher \| Critical Thinking in Math \| OISE, University of Toronto	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lateral.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lateral \| Divergent Lateral thinking	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medienbildung.team ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Working Group on Educational Theory and Practices of Critical Computational Literacy	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkouthere.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Vancouver Tutors \| Think Out Here Tutoring	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ndgradeskittles.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Professional Development Ideas for Teachers	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
independenceengine.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Independence Engine — Full Curriculum	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casp-uk.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomasminorsaunders.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	imaginetomsaunders \| Having a free style dialogue to follow curiosity and learn from each other as Co-Mentors	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinksociology.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Think Sociology	en	education Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanote.ai ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	UKMLA & AKT Revision for UK Medical Students \| SA Note	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanote.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	UKMLA & AKT Revision for UK Medical Students \| SA Note	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inbtween.app ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Inbetween — Western, but inbetween classes.	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samhawrites.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	samha's table – for anyone who loves to learn and think	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lakewoodeducation.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Lakewood Education Foundation - LEF Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
latinxed.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	LatinxEd \| Creating pathways for generations of latine leaders and learners	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blpedfoundation.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bend La Pine School Education Foundation	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.