similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to think-async.com

Think Async alternatives & similar sites

Asio C++ Library — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aeon-php.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Aeon, simple php DateTime library	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alglib.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ALGLIB - C++/C#/Java numerical analysis library	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csplib.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	CSPLib: A problem library for constraints	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cutk.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The C Utility Toolkit - C programming libraries	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janklab.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Janklab \| Nice little programming libraries for Matlab	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minifx.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	MiniFx \| A set of minimalistic libraries for structuring JavaFx GUIs.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcnpy.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - idaholab/MontePy: MontePy is the most user friendly Python library (API) to read, edit, and write MCNP input files. · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcnpy.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - idaholab/MontePy: MontePy is the most user friendly Python library (API) to read, edit, and write MCNP input files. · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acordero.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home - Antonio Cordero	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actor-framework.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The C++ Actor Framework - CAF, the C++ Actor Framework	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs50.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Visual Studio Code for CS50	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sixtyfps.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Slint \| Declarative GUI for Rust, C++, JavaScript & Python	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
slint.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Slint \| Declarative GUI for Rust, C++, JavaScript & Python	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
slint.tech ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Slint \| Declarative GUI for Rust, C++, JavaScript & Python	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcoding.io ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	mCoding - Software consulting, contracting, and training with James Murphy	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpplay.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	mcpplay - mcpplay	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
md-babel.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	md-babel: Executable Markdown code blocks and spreadsheets	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
md2cast.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	md2cast — Executable documentation for developers	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.