similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to thinicemacro.com

Thinicemacro alternatives & similar sites

Thin Ice Macroeconomics – Macro Consulting and Research — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
case-research.eu ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research	European Union en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) – UKRI	United Kingdom en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2morrownomics.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	2morrownomics – Futurology, politics and economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adul.info ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	American-Kurdish Institute for Economic Research	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdamirhossen.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MD. Amir Hossen \| Economist & Researcher	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
porteconomics.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	PortEconomics – Port Economics, Management & Policies	European Union en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
c2er.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Council for Community and Economic Research – Promoting excellence in community and economic research since 1961	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackdollar.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Collaborative Economics – Black Dollar Circulation Project	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luziabruckamp.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Luzia Bruckamp – I am an Economics PhD student at LSE. My main research interests are fertility choices and the continuing decline of birth rates.	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelscheiderbauer.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Scheiderbauer – Economics, Business and My Take on Things	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarinomics.work ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aarinomics - Economics Blog	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackeconomics101.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Black Economics 101 – BUILDING FOUNDATIONS FOR BLACK WEALTH	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badgerdata.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Economics + Data – Home	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sammarch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Don't shoot the messenger – Austrian economics & gun control.	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronscholl.online ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Scholl \| Economics \| Home	en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caixabankresearch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CaixaBank Research	en	economy Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanathanaeconomics.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Sanathana Economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theweekendeconomist.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Weekend Economist – Australian blog on Finance and Economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.