similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to theinfosecguy.com

Theinfosecguy alternatives & similar sites

Josh the InfoSec Guy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
theinfosecotter.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	The Infosec Otter	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
underfl0w.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Underfl0w's infosec corner	en	information-and-network-security Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
unchartedinfosec.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Uncharted Infosec - Venture into the uncharted waters of infosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberinfosec.tech ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home \| CyberInfoSec.tech	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
info-sec.cl ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	InfoSec	Chile en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertsinfosec.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	robertsinfosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertseder.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	robertsinfosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robsinfosec.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	robertsinfosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robseder.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	robertsinfosec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theinfotech.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Info Tech	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3sinfosec.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	3S InfoSec - Smart. Simple. Secure	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
la-infosec.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	LA Infosec Community	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tssois.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Sensuous Sounds Of INFOSEC — securityzed	en	information-and-network-security Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pwnage.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home \| infosec4breakfast	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actionableinfosec.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	actionable – infosec	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xkayala.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Satya Prakash \| InfoSec Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
blueteamconference.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Blue Team Con - An infosec conference for defenders.	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blueteamcon.info ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Blue Team Con - An infosec conference for defenders.	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.