similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to theindianphilosopher.com

Theindianphilosopher alternatives & similar sites

The Indian Philosopher - — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cambridgephilosophicalsociety.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cambridge Philosophical Society	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brhutchins.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Barnaby R. Hutchins \| Philosophy	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cedartree.blog ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CedarTree \| Science \| Technology \| Philosophy	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackspencer.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	JACK SPENCER \| PHILOSOPHY - jackspen@mit.edu	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rianabetzler.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Riana Betzler – Philosophy of Science, Ethics, Moral Psychology	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
unexaminedglitch.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	UnexaminedGlitch - Essays on the philosophy of mind and the history of psychology	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thebigger.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Bigger -	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdonnellinitiativeatmbl.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	McDonnell Initiative @MBL – Transforming discovery through collaborations among historians, philosophers, and life scientists	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newhorizonsci.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	New Horizons in Science – Exploring science beyond boundaries with an Indian perspective	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guardsci.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to the Guardian of Science®!	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thebiggestsundial.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	THE BIGGEST SUNDIAL	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quackorsnack.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Quack or Snack — The Pseudoscience Index	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csjonline.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	The Capspian Sea Journal	en	science Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neurophilo.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	V International Colloquium on Philosophy of Neuroscience \| Filosofia da Neurociência \| ICPN. International Colloquium on Philosophy of Neuroscience	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theaustralianopal.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	About the Australian Opal	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackfuturists.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Black Futurists in the Information Age Web Portal	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
growkudos.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home – Kudos: Growing the influence of research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janus-sphere.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Janus Sphere Innovations \| RBYRCT	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.