similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to subnetz.ch

Subnetz alternatives & similar sites

Raymann Design – Design-Systeme mit Wirkung — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
buero-webdesign.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Gestaltung mit Wirkung – Design & Auftritte \| Nelaya – Holistic Design	Switzerland de	design Contao Ecwid	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
fotostylistin.ch ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Gestaltung mit Wirkung – Design & Auftritte \| Nelaya – Holistic Design	Switzerland de	design Contao Ecwid	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cut-out.ch ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Thing Design – deine Designagentur mit Fokus auf starke Marken	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abraxas-design.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Abraxas Design – Design Büro	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitarbeitermagazine.ch ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	magazindesign – wir machen ihr magazin design	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
idrdesign.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	iDr Design – Designing Interaction	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbraun-design.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	JBraun Design – Grafik Design Freelancer München	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
karin-hoffmann-design.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Karin Hoffmann Design - Karin Hoffmann Design	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaffeeundkoepfe.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Mediendesign mit Überzeugungskraft und Texte mit Wirkung	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catharina-eckert.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Catharina Eckert – UX Designer for Design Systems	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ct-sign.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CTsign – Shop, Premium Design-Service & kreative Tools	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
humandesignstore.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Human Design Store – Human Design Club	de	design Shopify X-Cart	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joosdesign.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Joosdesign – Design is thinking made visual!	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achimtrumpfheller.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Satz InDesign-Templates Corporate Design – Perfekte Layouts	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agnesberreth.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Agnes B // Art Direktion und Grafikdesign – Designportfolio	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
celineroe.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Celine ROE Design – Celine Rötzel Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studiobasic.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design Studio – Digital Design	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
isik-kulu.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ISIK-KULU Grafikdesign \| Branding & Corporate Design Bodensee	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.