similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to statsandcats.com

Statsandcats alternatives & similar sites

Stats & Cats — Statistics explained clearly — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
statsforscience.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Statistics for Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statisticsfundamentals.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Statistics Fundamentals \| Master Statistics Fundamentals with Clarity	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statisticalbullshit.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Statistical Bullshit – Calling Bullshit on Bad Statistics	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frictiontheory.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Friction Theory — explained in plain English \| Tomas Lund	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statskingdom.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Statistics online - checks assumptions, interprets results	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
statisticslab.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Statistics Lab Münster — Mitigating Endogeneity Bias in Empirical Research	Germany~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stem-nastics.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Stemnastics LLC	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thebeakers.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	The Beakers — Research, Rewritten for Students	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
stemtostat.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	STEM to STAT	en	science Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
earthexplorers.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home - Earth Explorers	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
standarddeviationsymbol.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Standard Deviation Symbol (σ)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
genovag.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Genova Global — Read. Build. Publish.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
researchecosys.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Log In ‹ Research Ecosys — WordPress	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
relprime.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Relatively Prime – Stories from the Mathematical Domain	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zornscience.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	zornscience - Explore the wonders of science, one click at a time!	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stemcalendar.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	STEM Calendar — List View	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
eastern-stanys.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Eastern STANYS - Home	en	science phpBB	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
behavioralbiaslab.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Behavioral Bias Lab	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.