Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to stadforetag.net

Stadforetag alternatives & similar sites

Städföretag – Kvalitetssäkrad service och städtjänster — 8 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Business Utilities →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
minkundtjanst.com 32 match
1 shared topics
Sveriges Bästa Kundservice - Min Kundtjanst sv business-utilitiesWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
abc.stockholm 31 match
1 shared topics
Stockholms återbrukscentral – Återbruk av byggmaterial sv environmental-services-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bm-certification.net 30 match
1 shared topics
Startpage | BM Certification United Kingdom~ sv environmental-services-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
saneringar.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Sanera sv environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
thoressons.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Thoresson.com sv environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
prostad.eu 22 match
1 shared topics
Städning i Märsta, Norra Stockholm och Uppsala. ProStäd i Sigtuna AB European Union sv environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
3xl.nu 21 match
1 shared topics
3XL Concrete Demolition – Rivning – Håltagning – Sanering – Återbruk sv construction-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
a5marine.com 20 match
1 shared topics
Hem sv environmental-services-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.