similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sramirez.net

Sramirez alternatives & similar sites

Samuel Ramirez | Salesforce Architect — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
niyakumo.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Niyakumo \| System Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdelkarim.pro ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio \| Systems Architect & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lv-architect.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	LV-Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
springburst.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Salesforce Testing And QA Services \| Springburst	Netherlands~ en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iodatalab.eu ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	IO Data Lab \| System Architects	European Union en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rudychou.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Rudy Chou \| Product Systems & Experience Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debugonezero.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	debugonezero // Technical Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdullahkhan007.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abdullah Khan - Development Manager & Platform Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanticdeveloper.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Romantic Developer \| Fractional CTO & Software Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luzgonzalez.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Luz Gonzalez \| Product Strategy & UX Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliburakbasaran.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ali Burak Başaran \| Software Architect & Head of Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debled.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Robin de Bled \| System Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xmemo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	0xMemo — Software Architect & Blockchain Builder	PE~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdelazizalrihawi.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abdelaziz Al-Rihawi - Tech Lead \| Software Architect	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
theldo.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The LDO \| Engineer & System Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nkkrishna.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Krishnakumar NK — DGM / Solution Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caravel-partners.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Caravel \| NetSuite & Salesforce Implementation Partner	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axionic.agency ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Axionic \| The Architecture Layer Between Vision and Code	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.