similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to squidward.app

Squidward alternatives & similar sites

Squidward - AI Tooling Security Control Plane — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
triage-sec.com ↗	79 match 2 shared topics	Triage - Security Control Plane	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanctumai.dev ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	SanctumAI — The identity control plane for autonomous AI agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xhunter.io ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	0xHunter - Continous Security Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fencio.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Fencio — Runtime Control & AI Security for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fenrair.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	FenrAIr - Enterprise AI Security Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2thrivellc.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Cyber Security and AI Consulting	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astrix.security ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Identity Security for AI Agents & NHIs \| Astrix Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xclaw.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Local AI pentesting for security teams	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
blackmatterdefense.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Black Matter Defense — Enterprise AI Security Consultancy	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
touchmfa.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Browser Security for the AI Era \| Push Security	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tragentics.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Tragentics — AI Agent Security Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bltz.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Bltz AI - Agentic Defensive AI Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
traceforce.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Traceforce - AI Security Posture Management	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
splx.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	SPLX \| End-to-End Security for AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coreapexpartners.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	CORE Apex Solutions \| AI Governance & Cybersecurity Consulting	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fendray.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Fendray \| The agent security platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tracebitai.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Tracebit AI \| Expect the unexpected with security canaries	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
triarchsecurity.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Triarch Security	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.