similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to springerplus.net

Springerplus alternatives & similar sites

This page does not exist | Springer — International Publisher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
medicinematters.healthcare ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medischeloopbaan.tv ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
latexpert.org ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
healthinbedrijf.eu ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	This page does not exist \| Springer — International Publisher	European Union en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360scholar.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	360Scholar \| International Open-Access Scholarly Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
impubi.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	International Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbspress.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MB International Scholar Press	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achieverspremiumpublishers.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Achievers Premium Publishers \| Educational Publishing in Nigeria	Nigeria~ en	publishing-industry	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
corridorbooks.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Corridor Books — Independent Literary Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bnholdingsgroup.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BN Holdings Group LLC — Media & Internet Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samipubco.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SPC Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdcpublishers.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MDC Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andipublisher.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Andi Publisher	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
toprnovo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Novo Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
backstagebooks.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Backstage Books \| publisher	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lakhi.biz ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lakhi® Publishers	en	publishing-industry Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onixcreator.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Onix Creator — ONIX 3.0 Generator for Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samvaktijournals.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Samvakti Journals \| Multi-Disciplinary International research Journals	en	publishing-industry Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.