similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to spl0it.org

Spl0It alternatives & similar sites

Welcome to spl0it.org | Open Source Security Tools by Joshua "Jabra" Abraham — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
topsecuritytools.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SecTools.Org Top Network Security Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlinesecuritytools.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - Online Security & Tools	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentplanners.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentoperator.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentreadinessteam.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponseanalyst.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponseanalysts.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponseengineer.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponseengineers.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentauditors.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentauditor.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentaudit.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentassessment.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponses.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentagents.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentagent.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentagency.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incidentresponseteams.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hackors - Best Cybersecurity Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.