similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sphereresearch.org

Sphereresearch alternatives & similar sites

SPHERE — Society for the Progress, Human Rights, Empowerment & Equity — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
lakecountyfuture.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lake County Future — The Hub for Lake County, Ohio	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
americansocietyofguatemala.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF GUATEMALA	en	civic-affairs Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crowdscene.co ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	99 Antennas \| Empower Civic Engagment & Participation with Data Science	Colombia en	civic-affairs Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achrw.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ANTI CRIME AND HUMAN RIGHTS WING	en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5ifthward.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Empowering Change Through Community Engagement	en	civic-affairs Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actsonoma.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Act Sonoma — Community Action in Sonoma County	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rmofprogress.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	R.M. of Progress No. 351	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluelagos.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BlueLagos \| Empowering Communities through Innovation	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bocem.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bocozelle Community Development and Social Advancement \| BOCEM	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2james.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Progress Forward	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hodyl.co ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hodyl – For the city we share.	Colombia en	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mcciusa.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MCCI — Memetic Civic Communication Initiative	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
menawatch.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Civic Space Watchdog \| Monitoring Civic Space in the MENA Region	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acfn.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	We are the K'ai Tailé Denesųłiné \| Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation	en	civic-affairs WordPress Shopify	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcb7.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Manhattan Community Board 7 — Your Voice in the Neighborhood	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
r4pc.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	R4PC — Research for Policy Change	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
douglascountyor.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	DouglasCountyOR.com – The Information Gateway for Douglas County, Oregon	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theindrakeelpost.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Latest Sikkim News & Insights \| The Indrakeel Post	en	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.