similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to spectator98.com

Spectator98 alternatives & similar sites

// Marwan Aldahmani — Researcher & Builder — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xmaruf.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	0xmaruf — Security Researcher & Bug Bounty Hunter	en	information-and-network-security WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hebunilhanli.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	HEBUN \| Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ziz.me ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abdulaziz Almadhi · Offensive Security Researcher \| 3ziz.me	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
0xkannan.ninja ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kannan K \| Security Engineer & Full-Stack Builder	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xrama.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Sriram Kidambi	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ekofyi.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ekofyi — Reverse-engineering APIs. Building automation.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptoresearch.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Zero-knowledge Proofs \| Cryptographic Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rookmere.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Wilderyns: Portfolio of Al Wilde	en	information-and-network-security Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xgrid.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Ulysse Binggeli	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
aperbit.online ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Aperbit // Offensive Security & Protocol Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
rohitsah.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Rohit Sah	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spxnso.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	spxnso	en	information-and-network-security Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mcpblog.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	MCPBlog.dev — The MCP Ecosystem Blog	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elahmar.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Mohammed El Ahmar \| MERN Stack & Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xacb.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	0xacb	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdiyor.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	0xDiyor	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allenniktalov.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Allen \| Cybersecurity Engineer & Full-Stack Developer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcginty.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	s3ansh33p (Sean McGinty) · GitHub	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.