similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to snapbugs.at

Snapbugs alternatives & similar sites

Usersnap | PM's #1 User Feedback Platform and Tool — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
snapbugz.at ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Usersnap \| PM's #1 User Feedback Platform and Tool	Austria de	software-and-applications Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
snapbug.at ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Usersnap \| PM's #1 User Feedback Platform and Tool	Austria de	software-and-applications Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vellov.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Login - Vellov.io Platform	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sequality.at ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Sequality - Wir erschaffen Embedded User Experience	Austria de	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devbody.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Sign in · GitLab	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ph3.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	PH3	Austria de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deppendrehkreuz.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	GitHub · Change is constant. GitHub keeps you ahead. · GitHub	Germany de	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deegital.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	deegital \| Software development	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blendstylez.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Martin Maurer · blendstylez studio	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptocrack.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Lukas Fleischer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearfriend.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Dear Friend — digital products for humans	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
develicious.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Develicious Studios Weber	Germany de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sith.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	axelheer (Axel Heer) · GitHub	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meik.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Meik Minks – Proud dad, co-founder of @inoxio, software engineer, quality expert, scrum master, Ruby coder, mac user, volleyball trainer, free athlete, aikidoka, worldtrip veteran and mountain lover	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qumram.at ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Session Replay	Austria de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robusto.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Robusto: surviving a partial compromise of OSS package repositories - Google Docs	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anders.hamburg ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Homepage von Sven Anders	de	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ventspire.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	ventSpire – Strategische Softwareentwicklung	Germany~ de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.