similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to smallmultiple.dev

Smallmultiple alternatives & similar sites

Aaron Suggs — engineering leader, North Carolina — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
smallmultiples.dev ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	Aaron Suggs — engineering leader, North Carolina	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sbellware.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Scott Bellware — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
thibault-david.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	David Thibault — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamklockars.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Adam Oscar Klockars — Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pm.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tombenner.co ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Tom Benner \| Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackhumphrey.me ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jack Humphrey, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mattdutton.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Matt Dutton — iOS Engineer & Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffdanis.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jeff Danis \| Computer Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maxherzig.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Max Herzig - Software engineering leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alansaldivar.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Saldivar Studio — Engineering Leadership & Product Development	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
matthewmachuga.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Matt Machuga: Engineering Leader / Educator	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mattmachuga.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Matt Machuga: Engineering Leader / Educator	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobgwilliams.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Williams \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesrarthur.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	James R. Arthur \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprietolofkrantz.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprieto.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alberto-prieto-lofkrantz.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.