similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to skwiggs.dev

Skwiggs alternatives & similar sites

skwiggs.dev | This is my personal website. I’m an iOS Developer, currently based in The Netherlands. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jeffbaranski.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	My personal website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonlaw.me ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jason Law's Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahmetmertkaya.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ahmet Mert KAYA - Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meijiaming.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Mei Jiaming’s Blog \| This is Jiaming’s personal website, I’ll share some interesting things or techniques here.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pablomagaz.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Pablo Magaz's Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jennkalidoss.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meghajain.me ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Megha's Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonwo.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	simonwo.net \| The personal website of Simon Worthington, sometimes called Wo! Net.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
paburghelea.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Paul Burghelea \| Personal website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dickymr.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Personal Website \| Dicky Muhamad R	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markbluemer.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Mark Bluemer \| Personal Website and Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
botsak.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Botsak.com: Personal Website of Ben Sakac	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobrosenlund.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Rosenlund \| Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oyaraouf.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Omar Yasser Morsi - Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2color.me ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Norman - Developer, maker, and blogger	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galia.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Galia Appel’s Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mblackstock.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mike Blackstock \| Personal Web Page	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasbro.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jason Brown : That DevOps Guy \| [“I’m a DevOps-oriented Software Engineer currently making my way in team leadership”]	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.