similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to skogarforest.org

Skogarforest alternatives & similar sites

Skógar — Reforestation in the Westfjords of Iceland — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
blueforestfoundation.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Blue Forest Foundation - Marine Afforestation & Carbon Removal	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4life.earth ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	4LIFE.earth — Wetland Restoration Hub	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bluemx.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mangrove Restoration and Conservation Projects	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2iufc.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Inland Urban Forest Council	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisisrana.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Rana — Make Restoration Last	Netherlands~ en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onetrilliontrees.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	One Trillion Trees.org by Groasis - Reforestation, Anti-desertification, Water efficiency and Ecosystem Restoration	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landmarkprotocol.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	LandMark Protocol — Rewarding Watershed Stewardship	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auduboninternational.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Audubon International	en	environment Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landtrustaccreditation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Land Trust Accreditation Commission	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
bluecarbonprojects.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Blue Carbon Projects – Development Replenishment and Rehabilitation of REDD+ Mangrove Projects Around The World	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conservation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Conservation International	en	environment Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackwaterestuarynfm.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BUDS in the Blackwater Estuary - Home	en	environment Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onlyraininthedrains.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Only Rain in the Drains	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdstormwater.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Maryland Stormwater Organization – Fighting Stormwater Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landscapeconservation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Network for Landscape Conservation	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1mtcommunity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The One Megaton Community - Environmental Action in Chicago	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coralcostarica.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Costa Rica Coral Restoration: A Healthy Marine Environment for the Future	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coraltico.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Costa Rica Coral Restoration: A Healthy Marine Environment for the Future	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.