similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to skof.dev

Skof alternatives & similar sites

skof.dev — Digital Architect, Engineering Clarity — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
designergrace.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	DesignerGrace \| Enterprise Digital Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sayaintel.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	SayaIntel \| Premium Digital Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
simpsoff.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Simpson - Mobile Engineering Lead / Mobile Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jblume.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Blume — Software Engineer & Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jeremyrobertson.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jeremy Robertson — DevOps Engineer & Software Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pm.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakes.cloud ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jake Dahlgren — Computer Engineering Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jayantbansal.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jayant Bansal — Backend Engineering Team Lead	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dhanawada.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	N.R Dhanawada - Solutions Architect & Platform Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silvacms.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Silvacms - Engineering high-performance digital workflows	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamiekang.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jamie Kang — Engineering Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
padmajp.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Padmaj P Kumar — Reliability Engineering Manager & Digital Creator	India~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
treq.co ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Quantum Systems Engineering - TreQ	Colombia en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesj.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	James Jalandoni — Director of Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aetherial.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Aetherial \| Engineering the Sublime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webpopulous.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	SaaS Engineering Index - WEBPOPULOUS	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jakubpradeniak.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jakub Pradeniak - Engineering Notes	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
memeticengineering.ai ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Memetic Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.