similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to singh3y.dev

Singh3Y alternatives & similar sites

Abhishek Singh - Blog & Portfolio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Databases →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
corrineferdarkodataportfolio.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Corrine Ferdarko's Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larry-henry-jr.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Data Science Portfolio \| Larry Henry Jr.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbobin.me ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	mbobin’s blog	en	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samhburns.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Sam Burns \| Data engineer Organizer Brooklyn-based	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thiagob.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Thiago Baptista \| Engineer. Builder. Problem Solver.	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lampyre.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Lampyre: Data analysis & OSINT tool for everyone	en	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laplab.me ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	About \| Nikita Lapkov	en	databases Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
5bulletdata.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	5-Bullet Data \| Dev Bhosale \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
inboxmen.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxlover.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxmotion.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxlady.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxkiss.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxname.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxglobe.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxfaqs.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxconcepts.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inboxcell.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Outreach Magic \| Stop stitching CSVs across sequencers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.