similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to singh.am

Singh alternatives & similar sites

Jasdev Singh - Lead Product Designer & Builder • singh.am — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mattgoulart.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Matt Goulart - Product Designer & Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
sathwikaala.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sathwik Aala — Product Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jefforshalick.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jeff Orshalick Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbeyhastings.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abbey Hastings — Product \| Content	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sntr.co ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Hi, I’m Ste Grainer. » Ste Grainer, Designer & Developer	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsai humans	emailphone	none
oxymade.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	OxyMade – Design Sets & Templates for Oxygen Builder - OxyMade	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomasmcgee.co ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Thomas McGee • Designer, Software Engineer, and Creator	Colombia en	web-design-and-html	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonxuyang.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jason Yang - Design and Code	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxyninja.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	OxyNinja: Powerful Tools & Design Sets For Oxygen Builder	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weales.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Weales - Developer. Designer. Coffee Addict.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4templates.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Google Docs, Slides, Sheets and Products resources \| by 4Templates	Cyprus~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designsystemproblems.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Design System Problems \| Practical guides for solving common design system challenges	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mattdesignedit.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Designed by Matt	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
materialme.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Material Me: Design System & React Library	en	technology-and-computing Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
booleanandbean.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Boolean and Bean – Digital Products Studio	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sndp.co ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	sndp	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
acko.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Hackery, Math & Design — Acko.net	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxyextended.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Oxy Extended addon for Oxygen Builder	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.