similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to silverrosepress.com

Silverrosepress alternatives & similar sites

Silver Rose Press, LLC – Where Stories Bloom! — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gallatinadvisory.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Gallatin Advisory LLC – Making sense of publishing and the press	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silverstonepublishing.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Silver Stone Publishing – Chicago’s Trusted Book Publishers	United States~ en	publishing-industry	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
bookloompublishing.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Bookloom Publishing - Diverse Stories, One Community	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
diskettepress.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Diskette Press	en	publishing-industry Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silverleafpublishers.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Silver Leaf Publishers LLC	en	publishing-industry Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
differencepress.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Difference Press	en	publishing-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gannonmediagroup.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Gannon Media Group: Where Story Comes First	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disco.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Great stories start right — disco	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
booksandbounty.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Books & Bounty – What will we produce today?	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
mecs-press.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MECS Press	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schibsted.cl ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Schibsted \| We tell stories that matters	Chile en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culicidaepress.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Om - Culicidae Press	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
culicidaepress.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Om - Culicidae Press	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scapepress.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Scape Press \| Scape Press	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
schibsted-news-media.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Schibsted \| We tell stories that matters	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schibsted.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Schibsted \| We tell stories that matters	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schibstedmarketplaces.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Schibsted \| We tell stories that matters	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schibstedmedia.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Schibsted \| We tell stories that matters	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.