similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to shaanseet.com

Shaanseet alternatives & similar sites

Promoting Economic Growth For Shaan Seet, Craig, AK - Shaan Seet Incorporated — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
atmanirbharnepal.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Atmanirbhar Nepal: Economic Growth and Employment Opportunities \| Atmanirbhar Nepal	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cebr.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Leading economic forecasts and analysis \| Cebr	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
skopjeforum.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Homepage \| Skopje Economic Forum II	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eria.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ERIA \| Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorisliew.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Doris Liew \| Understanding and Shaping the Economic Future of Southeast Asia	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
c2er.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Council for Community and Economic Research – Promoting excellence in community and economic research since 1961	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aucklandeconomicdevelopment.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Auckland Economic Development \| Auckland Council	en	economy Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ert-la.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Economic Round Table (ERT)	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esatas.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tasmania - Economic Society of Australia	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skedcorp.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Southeast Kentucky Economic Development (SKED)	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ejpe.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ergodicityeconomics.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ergodicity economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hps-civicscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Economic Sentiment Index - Penta-CivicScience	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
case-research.eu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CASE – Center for Social and Economic Research	European Union en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astroeconomiccycles.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Astro Economic Cycles Home - astroeconomiccycles.com	en	economy WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atadleradvisory.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AtAdlerAdvisory \| analysis and economic advice	en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catholiceconomics.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Reviving the Catholic Economic Tradition - Catholic Economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caustindavis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	C. Austin Davis - Economics PhD - University of Michigan	en	economy Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.