similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to sewenz.com

Sewenz alternatives & similar sites

Sebastian E. Wenz – Postdoc at GESIS, Cologne — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
onesansebastian.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - One San Sebastian	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katherinedelahanty.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Katherine Delahanty – Portfolio	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
petemiksza.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Pete Miksza – Musician . Teacher . Scholar	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katherinecjensen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	KATHERINE JENSEN – Assistant Professor of Sociology and International Studies	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elizabethklainothess.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Elizabeth Klainot-Hess – PhD, The Ohio State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michelledlazarus.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dr Michelle D. Lazarus – Professor of Curiosity	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kelleyfong.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kelley Fong – Assistant Professor of Sociology	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catrinlundstrom.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Catrin Lundström – Homepage for Catrin Lundström	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kericedotensnitker.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kerice Doten-Snitker – Ph.D.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emmarich.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Professor Emma Rich – Website for Professor Emma Rich	United Kingdom en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melissacolonphd.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Melissa Colón, PhD	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ekinyasin.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	EKİN YAŞİN – CURATING IDEAS AND EXPERIENCES	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikehabegger.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mike Habegger, Ph.D. – Ph.D., Student Success Center, University of Delaware	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
peteastats.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Petea – Statistics & Psychology with a cup of tea	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meetingbasicneeds.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Human Ecology Education \| Sandra Ericson \| Substack	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
michirunagatsu.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Michiru Nagatsu {長津　十} \| just another philosopher	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chancethelibrarian.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Chance the Librarian – Zackary Chance Medlin	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elisarapadas.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Elisa Rapadas – Psychology Student & Researcher	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.