similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sessinger.com

Sessinger alternatives & similar sites

Steve Essinger | Applied Scientist & Engineer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Productivity →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
maxiprosmm.online ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Focus Timer	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berrostore.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Focus Timer	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
deep-mode.com ↗	35 match 1 shared topics	Deep Mode — Engineered for Deep Work	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
terriblesoftware.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Terrible Software – Software \| Engineering Leadership \| Tech	en	productivity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deep-work.info ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	DeepW \| Discipline Engine	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deepworkdepot.com ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	deep work timer \| go deep into focus	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whoowns.app ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	whoowns app	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deanyeong.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	What Matters Now Newsletter \| Dean Yeong	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decisioncommand.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Decision Command \| Stop second-guessing, start winning.	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mygirlarmy.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	My Girl Army Guide	en	productivity	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
whatever.you ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Whatever You	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deepfocustimer.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Deep Focus - Simple Productivity Timer	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdgo.me ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Mike D'Angelo \| ResultsLab.io Founder \| ResultsOS Creator	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
the-ledger-app.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	The Ledger — Early Access	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
motz.ai ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	motz.ai — Tools for a better life	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
employablepm.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Employable PM - Become a better PM through practical advice, and building with Rails and AI	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mynextverse.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	The Align Planner \| My Next Verse – My Next Verse Inc	en	productivity Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mypeakplanner.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Peak Planner \| Productivity Planner for Professionals – My Peak Planner	en	productivity Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.