similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to serverlesssam.com

Serverlesssam alternatives & similar sites

Serverless Sam — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
deploxy.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Deploxy \| Stdio MCP Server to Serverless proxy	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahlgrimm.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ahlgrimm.dev – Containers, Java on Azure, Serverless	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theuselessdevops.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The Useless DevOps	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpdeploy.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	mcpdeploy – Deploy MCP servers in 30 seconds	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpr.app ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Observability-first proxy for MCP servers \| mcpr	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gameye.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Game Server Orchestration Without the Cloud Tax \| Gameye	en	cloud-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpbuilders.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Production MCP Servers & MCP Consulting \| mcpbuilders.dev	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skillsovermcp.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Skills Over MCP — Host any GitHub repo as an MCP server	en	cloud-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
slmtechnologies.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Free yourself from servers by moving to the Cloud	en	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
satisficerworkshop.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	satisficerworkshop – tooling insight for solutions	en	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3xplaa.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	3xplaa — Observability primitives for small engineering teams	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
sawatkins.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Simon Watkins	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demiliani.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Stefano Demiliani – Taking the Web out of the box: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Azure, Serverless, Power Platform and all about the Microsoft's technology stack \| www.microsoftarchitects.com \| www.d365bc.com	en	cloud-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scaredofgeese.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	cgbaker.net	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agate-tech.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Agate Tech - DevOps as Service	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jadsamara.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Jad Samara - Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jakobondrey.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Jakob Ondrey	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonel-david.tech ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Simonel David - Business Development Director, ROSPIN	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.