similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to seruyange.com

Seruyange alternatives & similar sites

Seruyange – On software, life, and things between. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
danpearce.co.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Dan Pearce – Software Developer, Engineering, and Maker of Things	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deus.co.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Adam Bowen – Thoughts on software	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vireonsoftware.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Vireon Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
version2software.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Version 2 Software, LLC	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nurvexthink.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	NurvexThink — Software, built and published	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mignonelabs.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Mignone Labs – Software, Mobile Apps, and Digital Innovation	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
houseofsoft.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	House of Software: Blog \| Caffeinated opinion on software, its development and other digital things.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chiehyuchuang.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Angel Chuang – Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elevensoftwares.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Eleven Softwares	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
guimenezes.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Thoughts on Software Development -	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kellermansoftware.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kellerman Software	en	software-and-applications Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wisconsinsoftware.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Wisconsin Software	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cziane.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Clément ZIANE – Software Engineering	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dpike.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	David Pike – Senior Software Engineer	United Kingdom en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360dev.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	360Dev – Software Solutions	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cborgia.me ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	cborgia.me — Field Notes on Software & Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chamberlainsoftware.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Chamberlain Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gui-duck.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	GUIDuck Software – Apps and Stuff made by Jeremy Petter	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.