similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to sermik.com

Sermik alternatives & similar sites

Security Research Host — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cyberresearchsociety.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Research Society	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kav1n.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Kav1n \| Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
realinfosec.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	RiSec \| Cybersecurity Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nusasec.org ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	NusaSec Team - Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cerberion.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Cerberion // Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xteles.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Teles’s Blog \| Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hrushikraj.tech ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Hrushik Raj S \| Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ransomsight.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Ransomsight – Security Researchers	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xsha.io ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xweiss.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	0xWeiss - Security Researcher & Auditor	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ranveer.tech ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Bugatsec \| Ranveer - Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xfern.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xFern \| Independent Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersparrow.tech ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Sparrow — applied security research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asraaa.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ADAM Security Resources	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mihoulabs.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Mihou Labs - Offensive Cybersecurity Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
milenkoski.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aleksandar Milenkoski \| Cybersecurity Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cy4sec.co.uk ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	The Cyberfool — Independent Security Research	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chandlercamarena.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Chandler Camarena: Hardware Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.