similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to securitydawg.com

Securitydawg alternatives & similar sites

SecurityDawg – … let's be careful out there … — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
bojanstahl.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bojan Stahl – IT Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meline-micciche.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Méline Micciche – LegalTech Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2fort.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	_Start here - 2fort Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4warn.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4WARN.ME – Security Risk Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waterloocybersecurity.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CarefreeIT \| CarefreeIT \| Cybersecurity	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2ncyberdefense.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2N Cyber Defense – Security services	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janexdigital.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home – Cyber Security - Janex Digital	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ozales.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ozales – just another blog about cybersecurity	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4securenet.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4securenet – Cyber Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonjiang.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Simon Jiang – IT/Cybersecurity Specialist	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weareaegix.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aegix \| Your Cybersecurity Team. Without the Headcount.	Netherlands~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3qsecurity.io ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3Q Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
3qsecurity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3Q Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5jsecurity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	5Jsecurity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pageexec.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	grsecurity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 1
nrj-security.be ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NRJ Security	Belgium en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360security.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	360 Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamsapple.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adams Apple – Cybersecurity and Homelabbing!	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.