similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to seaturtle.dev

Seaturtle alternatives & similar sites

@seaturtle/graphql-model-directives 0.3.0 | Documentation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
boosmap.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Boosmap API Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weather-plus.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Weather Plus Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
waypnt.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	NovAtel Documentation Portal	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boyanghu.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	⚡ N8N Workflow Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oyhy.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	⚡ N8N Workflow Documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cubeengine.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CubeEngine Documentation by CubeEngine	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skeptfx.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Opinions To Be Challenged — SkeptFX 1.0 documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markeddocs.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MarkedDocs - Documentation that works as hard as you do	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simplywriting.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	SimplyWriting — Technical Documentation & Content Strategy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mspass.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	MsPASS Documentation — MsPASS 2.4.1.dev14+g66df775d documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomas-pk.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Thomas’ technical notes — Thomas' Notes 1.0 documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccompetition.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Model Counting \| Since 2020	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mriqc.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to MRIQC’s documentation! — mriqc 26.0.0.dev93+gc030ac191 documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariusene.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Marius Ene – Automation \| Monitoring \| Active Directory \| APIs \| Terraform \| Python \| PowerShell	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dierksen.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Dierksen \| Just a landing page and a bunch of redirection.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
889993070.xyz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Tech Insights & Innovation Trends \| Digital Future Perspectives	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
weappon.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Pagination.com - The fastest path from data to documents	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scottjbarnett.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Scott Barnett - Current Documents	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.