similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to scouterx.com

Scouterx alternatives & similar sites

ScouterX | Offensive Security — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xnano.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	0xNano \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agniops.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	AgniOps \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sisobe.net ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	SiSoBe — Offensive Security Reference	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hivesec.com.br ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Hive Security	Brazil en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobh.io ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Hammargren \| Offensive Security Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oussamarahali.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Oussama Rahali \| Offensive Security Engineer AppSec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahmadatef.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Ahmed Atef - Offensive Security Manager About	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csi-press.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cognitive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csipress.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cognitive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adversarycon.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	AdversaryCon \| Offensive Cyber Security Conference	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
denseq.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Denseq - Cybersecurity Offensive Security Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdelta.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xD3lta Research — Offensive & Defensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xpolar.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	0xpolar - Cybersecurity Research & Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystaldefense.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Defense – Offensive Security Consulting Firm	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thretect.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	ThreTect - Challenge Your Defenses \| Offensive Security Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdigi.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	0xdigi — Cybersecurity & Offensive Tools	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sayfcybersolutions.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Sayf Cyber Solutions — Offensive Security & Threat Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
offensivedefence.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Offensive Defence	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.