similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to scottracy.com

Scottracy alternatives & similar sites

Scott Tracy · UX Brand Design/Development — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
abstrat.studio ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Home - Abstrat Studio \| Design and Development	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
davidfairbrother.co.uk ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	David Fairbrother: UX, design and front-end development	United Kingdom en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2lch.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Anna Tulchinskaya \| UX \| Design \| Development	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliciaolink.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Creative Designer and Developer - Alicia Olink	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anurag.studio ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Anurag Adhikari \| Designer & Developer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lealaf.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Home - Lealaf Hellas Development & Design	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lydiabarkleydesigns.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Lydia Barkley — Designer. Developer. Builder.	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thegraphixguru.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	The Graphix GURU™ \| Creative Designer \| Brand Identity \| Graphics \| Web Development	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
noamrom.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Noam Rom - UX Designer & Learning Developer \| Portfolio	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sparshbajaj.me ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sparsh Bajaj \| UX Designer & Creative Developer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clay.global ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Clay \| UX Design & Branding Agency	en	web-design-and-html Sanity	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leahreeddesign.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Leah Reed Design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliceboscstudio.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Alice Bosc Studio — Strategic Design & Web Development for the Built Environment	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rollohardy.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Rollo Hardy \| UX designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrewlaw.design ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Andrew Law: UX Designer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creative-blueprint.co.uk ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Creative Blueprint \| Web Design, Development	United Kingdom en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
noemiaxavier.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Noémia Xavier Designer · Branding, Web & Visual Communication	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nonaworks.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Nona Creative and Development Studio	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.