Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to scigod.org

Scigod alternatives & similar sites

Scientific GOD Inc. — 10 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
vixra.org 100 match
282 shared linkers
viXra.org open e-Print archive en artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
vaccines.gov 94 match
273 shared linkers
Find pharmacies near you en medical-health robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
god.cool 83 match
194 shared linkers
God.cool - God Social Network - Find New Friends Here! en social-networking robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
quantamagazine.org 22 match
57 shared linkers
Science and Math News | Quanta Magazine en scienceWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cdc.gov 20 match
273 shared linkers
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC en infectious-diseases robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nobelprize.org 17 match
57 shared linkers
The official website of the Nobel Prize - NobelPrize.org en WordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
scribd.com 10 match
62 shared linkers
Client Challenge en business robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
zenodo.org 9 match
57 shared linkers
Zenodo en science robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
arxiv.org 6 match
119 shared linkers
arXiv.org e-Print archive en science robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
formsite.com 3 match
16 shared linkers
Formsite - Online Form Builder. Create HTML Forms & Surveys en web-developmentWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.