similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to sciencebeat.com

Sciencebeat alternatives & similar sites

ScienceBeat – Science Writing and Medical Writing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
custom-clarity.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Custom Clarity, LLC – Medical, Science, and Technical Writing	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4loveandscience.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	4Love and Science - 4Love+Science	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dr-rebecca-martin.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dr Rebecca Martin – Historian of Science and Medicine	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singingscience.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Singing Science – Science Through Fun, Musical, Mini-lectures!	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesevanbowengaddy.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	James Evan Bowen-Gaddy – Science Writer \| Educator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
singaboutscience.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sing About Science ... and Math!	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janelleweaver.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Janelle Weaver Science Writer	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasmeenkanwal.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jasmeen Kanwal – Science communicator and educator who is starting to dip her toe into writing.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystallinewritingllc.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Crystalline Writing, LLC – Clear. Beautiful. Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maryzeller.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Take a walk with me – Musings on science, writing, and life	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ratsinalabcoat.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	THREE RATS IN A LAB COAT – Come for the science writing, stay for the silly graphs.	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jecasmu.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
jarssc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Journal of Advance Research in Science and Social Science – JARSSC	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oursciencetoday.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Our Science Today – We Make All Science Our Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meikeifubo.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Free K-12 Science Lessons & Labs \| ScienceLab	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
threepointinfinity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Pi Site – A site related to science and mathematics	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sirishsubash.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sirish Subash – Science to Improve the World	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3mbed.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.