Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to scarp.com

Scarp alternatives & similar sites

Scarp - Programmert for verdiskapning — 9 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
mind-wave.tech 62 match
1 shared topics
Mindwave | Digital Innovation Studio no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sladdpdf.com 60 match
1 shared topics
No-Upload PDF Redaction | 100% Local & Secure | SladdPDF / RedactPDF no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
mektech.ca 60 match
1 shared topics
Mektech Home Page Canada no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
schjonhaug.com 36 match
1 shared topics
Schjønhaug AS - AI først, bygget med solid programmering no artificial-intelligence robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
adopus.net 32 match
1 shared topics
Nye Ad Opus: Journalsystem for smart og enkel tiltaksoppfølging no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ddmstage.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Change Detection no technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
gatship.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Home - GAT-Ship | Port Call Software no software-and-applicationsWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
oystein.dev 30 match
1 shared topics
Øystein Øvrebø no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
webrodent.com 21 match
1 shared topics
WebRodent AS | Software & AI-løsninger Norway~ no software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.