similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to scaleyourdev.com

Scaleyourdev alternatives & similar sites

Codeflyers: Where Software Starts With Understanding — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jackmaunders.com ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Jack Maunders — Software Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saunderstechnology.com ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Saunders Technology – Software Development Blog	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markojosifovic.com ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Marko Josifović - Full-Stack Software Engineer	Serbia~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marlenhima.dev ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Marlen Hima \| Software Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
padilha.io ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Padilha Software House	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mikkelsandberg.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Mikkel Sandberg \| Software Engineer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designingcoder.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Designing Coder \| We Build Software That Doesn't Suck	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jawsh.dev ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Joshua Williams \| Software Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webivor.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Webivor - Software and Digital Solutions	en	web-development WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javiergonzalez.dev ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Javier Gonzalez — Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gangione.dev ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Gabriel Angione — Software Architect & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marvengar.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Marcos Venteo \| Software Architect & Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpowell.dev ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Michael Powell — Senior Software Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
milijan-mosic.dev ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Milijan Mosić - Software Engineer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webatest.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	WebaTest - Fast story-level software testing with predictable credits	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ageelbaraa.info ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Albara Mustafa — Solution Architect & Senior Software Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ahsanmujtaba.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Ahsan Mujtaba — Project Manager & Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 5
borhansaflo.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Borhan Saflo \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.