similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to scala-bones.com

Scala Bones alternatives & similar sites

Scala Bones · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sim0n.dev ↗	80 match 3 shared topics	sim0n · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pabloa.dev ↗	69 match 3 shared topics	pabloa (Pablo) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jhdf.io ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	GitHub - jamesmudd/jhdf: A pure Java HDF5 library · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minion.pm ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	GitHub - mojolicious/minion: :octopus: Perl high performance job queue · GitHub	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dripbird.dev ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	GitHub - Voidious/dripbird: A TypeScript code refactoring tool that performs a small, opinionated set of automated refactors to code diffs. · GitHub	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scancode.io ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	GitHub - aboutcode-org/scancode.io: ScanCode.io is a server to script and automate software composition analysis with pipelines. This project is sponsored by the European Commission, NLnet NGI0, the Google Summer of Code, nexB and others generous sponsors! · GitHub	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deverdonces.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	verdonces · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jgjr.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	jgjr · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
booper.dev ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Booper · Scheduler	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pageindex.dev ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	SnippetProof — Run the code examples in your docs in CI	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
meic.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	meic · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cxam.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	cxam · GitHub	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dqnk.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	dqnk · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
agivigir.tech ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Arthur Givigir \| iOS Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bottleofcode.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Luke Hines : Bottle of Code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janavibv.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Janavi Bathala Vijayabhaskar	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galanjulio.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	juIio · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scenepartnerapp.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Scene Partner App - Cutting Edge Tech Portal	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.