similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to saswanson.com

Saswanson alternatives & similar sites

S.A. Swanson | Science. Tech. Business. And shiny things. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
onlinescientias.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Learning, Science and Society – blogging new ideas in science, business, learning	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neilmonteiro.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Neil Monteiro \| Science Presenter	United Kingdom en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fentsidoesscience.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Fentsi Does Science	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
brainsciencepodcast.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Brain Science	United States~ en	science Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csr-bd.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Centre for Social Research-CSR – Bridging Science, Technology, and the Social Fabric	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdsci.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Maryland Science Center	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cost.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	COST \| European Cooperation in Science and Technology	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coriolismagazine.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Coriolis Magazine – Writings on Science Communication	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ongalileo.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	EuroScience.Net \| bits, reviews and comments on science - forwarding	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samira-hamza.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Samira Portfolio \| Science journalist	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
123science.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	123 Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
52-insights.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	52 Insights - Intelligence. Inspiration. Conversations. Exploring the divide between popular culture and science.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
onwardsci.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Onward Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medianeuroscience.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Media Neuroscience Lab \| Research and Teaching at the Intersection of Communication, Technology, and Neuroscience	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lydiaelsechain.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lydia Chain – Science Journalist	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcquillaninstitute.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The McQuillan Institute - Science, Technology, and the Human Future	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larrywswanson.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Larry Swanson \| Brain Maps, Connectome, and Brain Architecture	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samvangele.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Van Gele – Science Society Blog	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.