similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to sap-labo.com

Sap Labo alternatives & similar sites

SAPラボ | SAPで生きる人のためのSAP研究所 — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mchkn.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mochiken, Software Engineer	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gammalab.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Gammalab	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
analytic-vba.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Top - 株式会社FeelCodeLab	ja	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7-peace.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	7 peace	ja	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dx-junkyard.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	dx-junkyard	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
regetbook.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	社畜エンジニアのおもちゃ箱	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keistudio.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	keistudio — keishinnishiura	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aoky.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Fine Software Writings	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nefastudio.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Cafe Cappuccino \| かふぇ・かぷちの/新幻想的独り言４　ねふぁの気まぐれな独り言	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bestjp.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	国内外のソフトを紹介 \| D2C（Direct to Consumer）	ja	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akgmini.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Software Development & etc. – 気の向くままに覚え書き・・・。	ja	software-and-applications Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deinoarea.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Deino's Area - 【Android Studio】エミュレータのプロキシ設定(共通/個別)	ja	software-and-applications WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
millustfree.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	millust	ja	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ambershift.dev ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ambershift	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1gon.org ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	モノゴン	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absplitter.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	AB Split Testr	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nabehide.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	nabehide's portfolio	ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nakakitech.com ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Nakaki Tech \| インフラエンジニアのためのOSS技術メモ	ja	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.